05.10.2012 | Autor:
Journal Article
An Ethical Comparison between In-Vitro Fertilization and NaProTechnology An Ethical Comparison between In-Vitro Fertilization and NaProTechnology

Journal Linacre Quarterly
Publisher Catholic Medical Association
ISSN 0024-3639 (Print)
Subject TheologyClinical MedicineEthics and Philosophy of Medicine
Issue Volume 79, Number 1 / February 2012
Category Article
Pages 57-72
Online Date Thursday, April 19, 2012
Authors
Juan R. Vélez, M.D., priest1

1 Prelature of Opus Dei

Abstract

In vitro fertilization (IVF) is morally objectionable for a number of reasons: the destruction of human embryos, the danger to women and newborn infants, and the replacement of the marital act in procreation. Recent studies have shown a significant risk of maternal death and morbidity associated with ovarian hyper-stimulation syndrome and multiple pregnancies after IVF. Due to lack of uniform regulations for IVF clinics, there is under-reporting of the adverse effects. NaProTechonology is one ethical alternative to IVF for female infertility. One study has confirmed earlier findings that NaProTechonology results in a number of live births similar to that of assisted reproductive technology, without the danger to women and newborn infants. Adoption of born children is another ethical and praiseworthy alternative to IVF.

Kategoria: Publikacje
Możesz śledzić komentarze do tego wątku poprzez subskrypcję RSS 2.0. Możesz napisać komentarz lub wysłać trackback ze swojej strony.
Napisz komentarz